Physiological responses during simulated 16 km recumbent handcycling time trial and determinants of performance in trained handcyclists StoneBen MasonBarry StephensonBen Goosey-TolfreyVicky 2020 <p><b>Purpose: </b>To characterise the physiological profiles of trained handcyclists, during recumbent handcycling, to describe the physiological responses during a 16 km time trial (TT) and to identify the determinants of this TT performance. </p> <p><b>Methods: </b>Eleven male handcyclists performed a sub-maximal and maximal incremental exercise test in their recumbent handbike, attached to a Cyclus II ergometer. A physiological profile, including peak aerobic power output (PO<sub>Peak</sub>), peak rate of oxygen uptake (V̇O<sub>2Peak</sub>), aerobic lactate threshold (AeLT) and PO at 4 mmol∙L<sup>-1</sup> (PO<sub>4</sub>), were determined. Participants also completed a 16 km simulated TT using the same experimental set-up. Determinants of TT performance were identified using stepwise multiple linear regression analysis. </p> <p><b>Results:</b> Mean values of PO<sub>Peak</sub> = 252 ± 9 W, V̇O<sub>2Peak</sub> = 3.30 ± 0.36 L·min<sup>-1</sup> (47.0 ± 6.8 mL·kg<sup>-1</sup>·min<sup>-1</sup>), AeLT = 87 ± 13 W and PO<sub>4</sub> = 154 ± 14 W were recorded. The TT was completed in 29:21 ± 0:59 min:s at an intensity equivalent to 69 ± 4% PO<sub>Peak</sub> and 87 ± 5% V̇O<sub>2Peak</sub>. PO<sub>Peak</sub> (r = -0.77, P=0.006), PO<sub>4</sub> (r = -0.77, P=0.006) and AeLT (r = -0.68, P=0.022) were significantly correlated with TT performance. PO<sub>4</sub> and PO<sub>Peak</sub> were identified as the best predictors of TT performance (r = 0.89, P<0.001). </p> <p><b>Conclusion:</b> PO<sub>Peak,</sub> PO<sub>4</sub> and AeLT are important physiological TT performance determinants in trained handcyclists, differentiating between superior and inferior performance whereas V̇O<sub>2peak</sub> was not. The TT took place at an intensity corresponding to <a>69% PO<sub>Peak </sub>and 87% V̇O<sub>2peak</sub></a>.</p>