Potter, Jonathan Disciplinarity and the application of social research response This response to Corcoran (2010) and Abell and Walton (2010) is organized around four key issues. 1. Disciplinarity: against a focus on the standard disciplinary boundaries of social psychology, and the conventional qualitative/quantitative division, it highlights meta-theoretical, theoretical and empirical disagreement over the object of analysis. 2. Social cognition: doubts about a suggested overlap between the concerns and methods of social cognition and discursive psychology are outlined. 3. Naturalistic data: the virtues of working with records of people living their lives outside of the narrow situations got up by social researchers are reiterated. 4. Application: the applied success of discursive psychological research is illustrated. untagged;Language, Communication and Culture not elsewhere classified;Studies in Human Society not elsewhere classified 2014-06-25
    https://repository.lboro.ac.uk/articles/journal_contribution/Disciplinarity_and_the_application_of_social_research_response/9473561