%0 Book Section %A Atzeni, Maurizio %A Ghigliani, Pablo %D 2008 %T The resilience of traditional trade union practices in the revitalisation of the Argentine labour movement %U https://repository.lboro.ac.uk/articles/chapter/The_resilience_of_traditional_trade_union_practices_in_the_revitalisation_of_the_Argentine_labour_movement/9497468 %K untagged %K Business and Management not elsewhere classified %X Market reforms have posed similar challenges to trade unions worldwide. In this regard, the current situation in Argentina does not differ from the global trend. De-industrialisation, de-centralisation of collective bargaining, reduction of the formal sector, flexibility in the labour market and the use of labour power have all affected trade unions’ capacity to mobilise workers and play a major progressive role in society. In addition, particularly over the last decade, the effects of thirty years of economic liberalisation combined with an explosion in the rate of unemployment has led to mass poverty and enormous class divisions, changing the landscape of social mobilisation in Argentina. On the one hand, mass unemployment disciplined wage-labourers; on the other, new territorial organisations, mainly of those workers now unemployed – the so-called piqueteros (for picket) – have proliferated and sustained the virulent social protests for employment and social programmes which characterised the country at the turn of the century. In this context, scholars have tended to assume the definitive demise of trade unions and their methods of struggle, turning their attention to the new social movements. Signs of trade union revitalisation however, composed of both traditional and innovative aspects, have emerged in recent years. This chapter evaluates the old and the new, embedded in the indicators of this incipient revitalisation, bearing in mind that in Argentina today any analysis of the limits and prospects for trade unions and their relevance within society intersect with the analysis of the broader process of the social mobilisation of the subaltern classes. %I Loughborough University