2134/35599
Nicholas Riedel
Nicholas
Riedel
A. Santamaria Lancia
A. Santamaria
Lancia
Mekbib Amdemeskel
Mekbib
Amdemeskel
Sune Thorsteinsson
Sune
Thorsteinsson
Peter B. Poulsen
Peter B.
Poulsen
Fabian Plag
Fabian
Plag
Ingo Kroger
Ingo
Kroger
Lenneke H. Slooff
Lenneke H.
Slooff
Mark J. Jansen
Mark J.
Jansen
Anna J. Carr
Anna J.
Carr
Petra Manshanden
Petra
Manshanden
Martin Bliss
Martin
Bliss
Tom Betts
Tom
Betts
Inigo Petrina Jauregui
Inigo Petrina
Jauregui
Mikel Ezquer Mayo
Mikel Ezquer
Mayo
Jose L. Balenzategui
Jose L.
Balenzategui
Ruben Roldan
Ruben
Roldan
Ulli Kraling
Ulli
Kraling
Ghassan Baarah
Ghassan
Baarah
Beniamino Iandolo
Beniamino
Iandolo
Rasmus S. Davidson
Rasmus S.
Davidson
Anders Thorseth
Anders
Thorseth
Carsten Dam-Hansen
Carsten
Dam-Hansen
Gisele A. dos Reis Benatto
Gisele A. dos Reis
Benatto
Interlaboratory comparison of methodologies for measuring the angle of incidence dependence of solar cells
Loughborough University
2018
untagged
Mechanical Engineering not elsewhere classified
2018-10-30 14:47:14
Conference contribution
https://repository.lboro.ac.uk/articles/conference_contribution/Interlaboratory_comparison_of_methodologies_for_measuring_the_angle_of_incidence_dependence_of_solar_cells/9558314
The aim of this work is to compare angle of incidence (AOI) measurement setups for solar cells between laboratories with such capability. For the first time, we compare relative light transmission measurements among eight laboratories, whose measurement techniques include indoor and outdoor methods. We present the relative
transmission measurements on three 156 mm x 156 mm crystalline-Si (c-Si) samples with different surface textures. The measurements are compared using the expanded uncertainties provided by each laboratory. Five of the eight labs showed an agreement better than ±2% to the weighted mean between AOIs from -75° to 70°. At AOIs of ±80° and ±85°, the same five labs showed a worst case deviation to the weighted mean of -3% to 5% and 0% to 18%, respectively. When
measurement uncertainty is considered, the results show that measurements at the highest incidence angle of ±85° are
problematic, as measurements from four out of the six labs reporting uncertainty were found non-comparable within their stated uncertainties. At 85° AOI a high to low range of up to 75% was observed between all eight laboratories.