Loughborough University
Browse
JMMR-12-037.R3_with reference.pdf (324.26 kB)

Do different training conditions facilitate team implementation? A quasi-experimental mixed methods study

Download (324.26 kB)
journal contribution
posted on 2015-02-11, 15:07 authored by Karina Nielsen, Raymond Randall, Karl B. Christensen
A mixed methods approach was applied to examine the effects of a naturally occurring teamwork implementation supported with training. The first objective was to integrate qualitative process evaluation and quantitative effect evaluation to examine how and why the training influence intervention outcomes. The intervention (N = 328) was supplemented with four training conditions (no training, team member training, team leader training and a combination of training types). The second objective was to examine whether different training conditions support team member training in isolation, but not in combination, led to positive outcomes. The integrated analysis of qualitative and quantitative data indicated that a number of contextual factors interacted with training experiences and outcomes to influence the success of team implementation.

History

School

  • Business and Economics

Department

  • Business

Published in

Journal of Mixed Methods Research

Volume

Forthcoming

Issue

1

Pages

1 - 48 (48)

Citation

NIELSON, K., RANDALL, R. and CHRISTENSEN, K.B., 2017. Do different training conditions facilitate team implementation? A quasi-experimental mixed methods study. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 11(2), pp.223-247.

Publisher

SAGE Publications / © The Authors

Version

  • AM (Accepted Manuscript)

Publisher statement

This work is made available according to the conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0) licence. Full details of this licence are available at: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/

Publication date

2017

Notes

This is the accepted version of a paper subsequently published in the serial, Journal of Mixed Methods Research. The definitive version is available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1558689815589050

ISSN

1558-6901

Language

  • en