Loughborough University
Browse
Applied Ergonomics Paper Final Version (with figures).pdf (644.84 kB)

Driving performance and driver discomfort in an elevated and standard driving position during a driving simulation

Download (644.84 kB)
journal contribution
posted on 2015-03-18, 15:35 authored by Jordan Smith, Neil Mansfield, Diane GyiDiane Gyi, Mark Pagett, Bob Bateman
The primary purposes of a vehicle driver’s seat, is to allow them to complete the driving task comfortably and safely. Within each class of vehicle (e.g. passenger, commercial, industrial, agricultural), there is an expected driving position to which a vehicle cabin is designed. This paper reports a study that compares two driving positions, in relation to Light Commercial Vehicles (LCVs), in terms of driver performance and driver discomfort. In the ‘elevated’ driving position, the seat is higher than usually used in road vehicles; this is compared to a standard driving position replicating the layout for a commercially available vehicle. It is shown that for a sample of 12 drivers, the elevated position did not, in general, show more discomfort than the standard position over a 60 minutes driving simulation, although discomfort increased with duration. There were no adverse effects shown for emergency stop reaction time or for driver headway for the elevated posture compared to the standard posture. The only body part that showed greater discomfort for the elevated posture compared to the standard posture was the right ankle. A second experiment confirmed that for 12 subjects, a higher pedal stiffness eliminated the ankle discomfort problem.

History

School

  • Design

Published in

Applied Ergonomics

Citation

SMITH, J. ... et al, 2015. Driving performance and driver discomfort in an elevated and standard driving position during a driving simulation. Applied Ergonomics, 49, pp.25–33.

Publisher

© Elsevier

Version

  • AM (Accepted Manuscript)

Publisher statement

This work is made available according to the conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0) licence. Full details of this licence are available at: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/

Publication date

2015

Notes

This article was accepted for publication in Applied Ergonomics [© Elsevier] and the definitive version is available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2015.01.003

Language

  • en

Usage metrics

    Loughborough Publications

    Exports

    RefWorks
    BibTeX
    Ref. manager
    Endnote
    DataCite
    NLM
    DC