Empirical investigation of the impact of using co-design methods when generating proposals for sustainable travel solutions
journal contributionposted on 28.09.2015 by Val Mitchell, Tracy Ross, Andrew May, Ruth Sims, Christopher J. Parker
Any type of content formally published in an academic journal, usually following a peer-review process.
This paper presents an empirical comparison of idea generation within the context of reducing the number of single occupancy car journeys to and from a UK university campus. Separate co-design and consultative groups were matched with respect to 1) creativity when problem solving, 2) normal commuting mode and 3) intention to adopt sustainable behaviours. The co-design group generated a significantly greater number of innovative ideas than the consultative group (using an email based methodology); however this was due to the greater number of total ideas (rather than the higher proportion of innovative ideas) generated by this group. The co-design group was able to think more systemically about potential solutions and generate proposals that were not either linked to their own commute mode, or aligned with any one specific mode of transport. The findings suggest that co-design offers benefits as a process for idea generation within the sustainable travel context as it promotes idea generation and a more holistic perspective on the problem and potential solutions.
This study was undertaken within the Ideas in Transit project (www.ideasintransit.org), funded supported by the UK Government (via the Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council, Grant Ref. EP/F005172/1, the Technology Strategy Board, Grant Ref. 400050, and the Department for Transport).