Loughborough University
Browse
Blanco_Sustainability assessment of trenches - clean.pdf (571.13 kB)

Sustainability assessment of trenches including the new eco-trench: A multi-criteria decision-making tool

Download (571.13 kB)
journal contribution
posted on 2019-08-16, 09:47 authored by Maria del Mar Casanovas-Rubio, Pablo Pujadas, Francesc Pardo-Bosch, Ana Blanco-AlvarezAna Blanco-Alvarez, Antonio Aguado

Narrow trenches are a common technique for the installation of utility pipelines of small diameter. The excavated soil is not always appropriate as landfill and, in those cases, an appropriate soil from somewhere else (ex. a borrow pit or another construction site) should be used instead (classical solution, CS). Another common solution is to use a controlled low-strength (cementitious) material (CLSM) as backfill instead of compacted soil. However, both solutions lead to increased raw material consumption, waste generation, need for transportation, and CO2 emissions. In an attempt to address these issues, researchers developed an eco-trench (ECO) that reuses the excavated soil of narrow trenches to produce a controlled low-strength material to be used as landfill. Although technically viable, the sustainability of this solution versus the traditional solution has not been properly addressed. Hence, this paper aims to develop a method for the sustainability assessment of trenches. The Sustainability Index of Trenches (SIT), based on the MIVES decision-making method, enables the assessment and prioritisation of different types of trenches according to sustainability criteria. Criteria, indicators, weights and value functions were specifically defined based on seminars with experts in the field of utility services and construction. A case study was performed in which four types of trenches (CS, CS with recycling CS+R, CLSM and ECO) were assessed and prioritised according to SIT. ECO resulted in the most sustainable alternative with a SIT of 0.80 out of 1 followed by CS+R, CS and CLSM with SITs of 0.63, 0.40 and 0.38 respectively. The sensitivity analysis showed consistent results in different scenarios. These findings demonstrate the capability and reliability of SIT as a decision-making tool for the evaluation of the sustainability of different construction processes for trenches and the prioritisation of the most suitable solution for different situations.


History

School

  • Architecture, Building and Civil Engineering

Published in

Journal of Cleaner Production

Volume

238

Publisher

Elsevier BV

Version

  • AO (Author's Original)

Rights holder

© Elsevier

Publisher statement

This paper was accepted for publication in the journal Journal of Cleaner Production and the definitive published version is available at https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.117957

Acceptance date

2019-08-07

Publication date

2019-08-09

Copyright date

2019

ISSN

0959-6526

eISSN

1879-1786

Language

  • en

Depositor

Dr Ana Blanco Alvarez

Article number

117957

Usage metrics

    Loughborough Publications

    Categories

    No categories selected

    Exports

    RefWorks
    BibTeX
    Ref. manager
    Endnote
    DataCite
    NLM
    DC