This paper examines nineteenth-century anarchist evaluations of the 1871 Paris Commune and three post-Commune defences of commune organisation to conceptualise anarchist communalism. The argument is that anarchists characterised the Paris Commune as a defeat and that a generation of post-Commune anarchists defended commune organisation as the revolutionary aspiration in need of articulation. I use Albert Camus’ idea of defeat as the pacification of a noble cause and Christopher Hill’s theorisation of ideation shift to develop the conception of defeat. I discuss the work of Peter Kropotkin, Gustav Landauer and Rudolf Rocker to present the account of commune organisation. By showing how each used Marx’s Civil War in France as a foil, I relate the perception of the Paris Commune’s defeat to the rejection of state socialism and the defence of anarchist communalism.<p></p>
History
School
Social Sciences and Humanities
Department
International Relations, Politics and History
Published in
Communalism as a Democratic Repertoire
Publisher
Routledge
Version
AM (Accepted Manuscript)
Publisher statement
This is an Accepted Manuscript of a book chapter published by Routledge/CRC Press in Communalism as a Democratic Repertoire on 01/12/2025, available online: http://www.routledge.com/[BOOK ISBN URL]