This chapter is concerned with inclusive judging, in the sense of fulfilling the requirement of procedural justice that all individuals are treated with dignity and respect. Inclusive judging is not simply ‘judging as usual’, and the ways in which judging traditionally has not been inclusive are identified. Techniques of inclusive judging are considered, based on studies of ‘real world’ instances of inclusive judging, as well as imagined approaches derived from feminist and other critical judgment rewriting projects. This also enables reflection on the limits of inclusivity that can be exercised by individual judges. The chapter then examines alternative, more consciously inclusive justice processes. Examples are both real, such as problem-solving courts, and imagined, such as people’s tribunals. It concludes by speculating on the future of inclusive judging and the types of inclusivity that may or may not be systemically embraced.<p></p>
This is a draft chapter/article. The final version is available in Research Handbook on Judging and the Judiciary edited by Sophie Turenne and Mohamed Moussa, published in 2025, Edward Elgar Publishing Ltd
https://doi.org/10.4337/9781788978743
It is deposited under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, and is not altered, transformed, or built upon in any way.