This chapter examines the anarchist case for abolition by analysing the Peter Kropotkin’s In French and Russian Prisons (1887), perhaps the most influential historical critique. Using themes of environment, culture and social relationships, I discuss his account, explain his scepticism about reform and explain why he concluded that the only sensible answer to the question ‘are prisons necessary?’ was ‘no’. The final section follows the trajectory of two lines of Kropotkin’s abolitionist thesis in anarchist thought. The first ‘environmental’ strand focuses on the systemic injustices that incentivise wrongdoing and the second ‘ethical’ thread emphasises the faultiness of the concept of crime. The argument is that both underwrite the anarchist case for prison abolition.
History
School
Social Sciences and Humanities
Department
International Relations, Politics and History
Published in
Abolitionist Voices: Ideas, Traditions and Dilemmas
Publisher
Bristol University Press
Version
AM (Accepted Manuscript)
Publisher statement
This is a post-peer-review, pre-copy edited version of an extract/chapter published in Abolitionist Voices: Ideas, Traditions and Dilemmas. Details of the definitive published version and how to purchase it are available online at: https://bristoluniversitypress.co.uk/abolitionist-voices