Aitchison, Popular Resistance and the Idea of Rights.pdf (325.75 kB)
Popular resistance and the idea of rights
Neo-republican theorists have expressed scepticism at the idea of non-institutional moral
rights which they associate with objectionable aspects of the natural rights tradition.
However, their alternatives risk making rights the gift of the state and so losing the role of
rights as a vocabulary of political critique and struggle. In this chapter, I defend the
coherence of rights as moral entitlements which individuals possess independently of state
recognition. I examine an early radical strand of natural rights thinking as articulated by
the English Levellers. These early modern radical republicans defended a right to
resistance as a fall-back right that guaranteed the other rights one enjoyed. Attention to
this current of thinking has the potential to correct the statist bias of contemporary
republican accounts by highlighting the idea of rights as a vocabulary of social criticism
tied to the people as a source of moral claims and collective resistance.
History
School
- Social Sciences and Humanities
Department
- Politics and International Studies
Published in
Radical Republicanism: Recovering the Tradition's Popular HeritagePages
103 - 117Publisher
Oxford University Press, USAVersion
- AM (Accepted Manuscript)
Rights holder
© Oxford University PressPublisher statement
Reproduced by permission of Oxford University Press, https://global.oup.com/academic/product/radical-republicanism-9780198796725?cc=gb&lang=en&Publication date
2020-03-20Copyright date
2020ISBN
9780198796725; 0198796722Publisher version
Language
- en