Neo-republican theorists have expressed scepticism at the idea of non-institutional moral
rights which they associate with objectionable aspects of the natural rights tradition.
However, their alternatives risk making rights the gift of the state and so losing the role of
rights as a vocabulary of political critique and struggle. In this chapter, I defend the
coherence of rights as moral entitlements which individuals possess independently of state
recognition. I examine an early radical strand of natural rights thinking as articulated by
the English Levellers. These early modern radical republicans defended a right to
resistance as a fall-back right that guaranteed the other rights one enjoyed. Attention to
this current of thinking has the potential to correct the statist bias of contemporary
republican accounts by highlighting the idea of rights as a vocabulary of social criticism
tied to the people as a source of moral claims and collective resistance.
History
School
Social Sciences and Humanities
Department
Politics and International Studies
Published in
Radical Republicanism: Recovering the Tradition's Popular Heritage