posted on 2014-07-17, 10:59authored bySusan Condor
In this chapter I consider some dilemmatic tensions within contemporary
attempts to (re)brand Britain a “multicultural society”. I start out by considering two
political speeches in which Labour Party ministers associated British Multiculturalism
with the general liberal values of social inclusion, tolerance, human rights,
progressive change and cosmopolitan moral and political sensibility. Analysis of the
text of these speeches reveals tensions within these arguments. First, the rhetorical
formulations that the speakers used to justify the political project of British
Multiculturalism tacitly presupposed a natural order in which nations are normally
populated by a racially and culturally homogenous folk. Second, British
Multiculturalism is presented as a form of brand distinctiveness, differentiating the
United Kingdom from other polities, and endowing the British state with commercial
and military advantage in the international arena. Finally, far from constituting a post-
Anglocentric, post-colonial re-formulation of national identity, the specific narratives
used to legitimate the construct of British Multiculturalism closely echo the discursive
tropes previously used to promote British Imperialism.
CONDOR, S., 2011. Rebranding Britain? Ideological dilemmas in political appeals to “British Multiculturalism”. IN: Barrett, M., Flood, C. and Eade, J. (eds.) Nationalism, Ethnicity, Citizenship: Multidisciplinary Perspectives. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing, pp. 101 - 134.
This is a chapter from the book, Nationalism, Ethnicity, Citizenship: Multidisciplinary perspectives. The publisher's website is at: http://www.cambridgescholars.com/