Loughborough University
Deacon Wring v4.pdf (168.1 kB)

Still life in the old attack dogs: the press

Download (168.1 kB)
posted on 2016-06-02, 09:47 authored by David DeaconDavid Deacon, Dominic WringDominic Wring
During the 2015 campaign there was considerable negativity and partiality in much press reporting; it was not difficult to find examples of where robust political partisanship descended into personal vilification. Some of this was the kind of journalism that had been repeatedly highlighted and criticized only a few years before, most notably in the House of Commons following the 2011 hacking scandal and subsequently during the ensuing year-long Leveson Inquiry. As a counter balance, some opinion-forming commentators believed this election might witness digital platforms assuming a more significant, potentially influential role in framing public participation in, and perceptions of, the contest. At the close of the campaign Alastair Campbell observed: ‘Why has social media been so important? Politicians aren’t trusted any more, business isn’t trusted like it was, the media is certainly not trusted like it was… The genius of social media, and the genius of Facebook is the concept of the friend. We trust our friends’.



  • Social Sciences


  • Communication, Media, Social and Policy Studies

Published in

The British General Election of 2015


302 - 336 (34)


DEACON, D. and WRING, D., 2015. Still life in the old attack dogs: the press. IN: Cowley, P. and Kavanagh, D. (eds.). The British general election of 2015. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, pp.302-336.


Palgrave Macmillan (individual chapters © respective authors)


  • AM (Accepted Manuscript)

Publisher statement

This work is made available according to the conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0) licence. Full details of this licence are available at: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/

Publication date



This extract is taken from the author's original manuscript and has not been edited. The definitive, published, version of record is available here: http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/9781137366115. It has been reproduced with with permission of Palgrave Macmillan.




  • en