<p dir="ltr">Disasters have been catching the attention of politicians, news reports, academics, and many others for centuries; yet the way that disasters have been framed changes significantly depending on who is talking about them and to whom. This chapter demonstrates that disasters cannot be understood without untangling unequal and often oppressive social, political, and economic systems. We argue that framing disasters as “natural”, “unexpected”, “sudden”, and “events” promotes the idea that disasters are tragic but simply inevitable and ignores their social and political origins. We discuss the concepts most widely used—and contested—to define disasters and explain why these concepts can be so problematic and indeed can often only be unders</p>
Open Access This chapter is licensed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license and indicate if changes were made.
The images or other third party material in this chapter are included in the chapter's Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the chapter's Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder.