Optimising healthcare facility value through better briefing and optioneering CAMERA READY COPY.pdf (102.33 kB)
0/0

Optimizing healthcare facility value through better briefing and optioneering

Download (102.33 kB)
conference contribution
posted on 20.10.2009 by Ruth Sengonzi, Peter Demian, Stephen Emmitt
There have been concerns over the capability of most National Health Service (NHS) hospitals to demonstrate best value in providing non-clinical service to NHS trust customers. In response to the need to demonstrate the Whole Life Value (WLV) of healthcare facilities, the briefing and project optioneering processes need to be tackled. This paper investigates the role of strategic briefing and optioneering (option selection) in creating and delivering WLV for both first and future generation stakeholders. Effective construction briefing relies on, among others, effective capture, analysis and use of information (needs and requirements) from all stakeholders to inform project options. It is also believed that project and facility strategy must be directly linked with the specific needs and requirements (among other things) in order to reflect exactly what the stakeholders and end-users value in a built environment. The paper reviews the underlying philosophies and attempts to make sense of a probable theoretical linkage between the three concepts: WLV, strategic briefing and optioneering. Building on the available literature, the paper introduces a research in progress which is reviewing WLV of healthcare facilities and how to improve it. The results from WLV and briefing literature are pointing towards the early involvement of stakeholders, including endusers as a way forward to achieving long-lasting value.

History

School

  • Architecture, Building and Civil Engineering

Citation

SENGONZI, R., DEMIAN, P. and EMMITT, S., 2009. Optimizing healthcare facility value through better briefing and optioneering. IN: Ahmed, V. ... et al, (eds.). 9th International Postgraduate Research Conference (IPGRC), Research Institute for the Built and Human Environment (BuHu), Salford, UK, 29-30th January, pp. 352-365.

Publisher

© Research Institute for the Built and Human Environment (BuHu), Salford University

Version

AM (Accepted Manuscript)

Publication date

2009

Notes

This paper is limited to academic use only. It was presented at the 9th International Postgraduate Research Conference (IPGRC)

Language

en

Exports

Logo branding

Exports