boyle_ap1.pdf (378.8 kB)
Download file

A Reflective study on the use of CAA to test knowledge and understanding of mineralogy

Download (378.8 kB)
conference contribution
posted on 24.05.2006, 14:04 authored by A. Boyle
Use of multiple choice question based computer aided assessment to assess level-one (first year) mineralogy produced a reliable assessment, though with rather poor scores. The use of negative marking contributed to this, and also drew negative comment from the student cohort. Reflection on these outcomes led to the use of multiple response questions, which performed better and did not encourage negative student feedback. CAA performance does not equate very well with practical coursework assessment. However, these two assessments are addressing different learning outcomes and so this disparity is not surprising. Statistical analysis suggests that these two forms of assessment give a truer indication of a student’s ability when they are combined. It enforces the conclusion that appropriate assessment tools should be used for stated learning outcomes and that multimodal assessment is best.

History

School

  • University Academic and Administrative Support

Department

  • Professional Development

Research Unit

  • CAA Conference

Pages

387892 bytes

Citation

BOYLE, A., 2002. A Reflective Study on the use of CAA to Test Knowledge and Understanding of Mineralogy . IN: Proceedings of the 6th CAA Conference, Loughborough: Loughborough University

Publisher

© Loughborough University

Publication date

2002

Notes

This is a conference paper.

Language

en

Usage metrics

Categories

Keywords

Exports