Loughborough University
Browse

A comparative study of the Field Marshal versus the Advanced Artificial Athlete on artificial and natural sports surfaces.

Download (1.03 MB)
conference contribution
posted on 2024-09-26, 13:26 authored by Kerr Lambert, John McLuckie, Tom Chilvers

Engineering of Sport 15 - Proceedings from the 15th International Conference on the Engineering of Sport (ISEA 2024)

The Field Marshal (FM) is a compact, wireless, and versatile alternative to the Advanced Artificial Athlete (AAA), measuring shock absorption (%), vertical deformation (mm), and energy restitution (%) from a single drop. The FM offers several advantages over the AAA, including simplified setup, operation and a weight saving of 14.8kg facilitating use by a single operator within HSE safe lifting regulations. Whilst the two devices are significantly different in construction and drop height, the principal method of measuring impacts on a surface using a calibrated accelerometer remains constant. Currently, the FIFA Handbook of Test Methods [1] dictates the use of an AAA to measure shock absorption (FIFA Test Method 04a), vertical deformation (FIFA Test Method 05a), and energy restitution (FIFA Test Method 13). A comparative study was conducted on artificial and natural turf surfaces to validate the precision and accuracy of the FM, analysing and comparing data collected on both devices. 

History

Usage metrics

    Mechanical, Electrical and Manufacturing Engineering

    Categories

    No categories selected

    Licence

    Exports

    RefWorks
    BibTeX
    Ref. manager
    Endnote
    DataCite
    NLM
    DC