A comparison of an innovative web-based assessment tool utilizing confidence measurement to the traditional multiple choice, short answer and problem solving questions
posted on 2009-05-01, 11:30authored byGraham Farrell
Computerized assessment is playing a major role in IT education, with
extensive utilization of the multiple choice question (MCQ) format. This is
mainly due to the ease of adaptation of MCQs into the internet environment,
offering extensive advantages to both the student and the instructors. This
study analyzes the results of students’ grades using an alternative web-based
assessment tool and the more traditional modes of assessment, being
Multiple Choice Questions, Short answers and Problem Solving (Scenario)
questions. The Multiple Choice Questions with Confidence Measurement
(MCQCM) is a web based assessment tool that permits the student to register
their level of confidence in their answer, and was included as a revision tool
for the duration of the semester and as a component of the final exam.
Additionally the exam also contained questions using more traditional
methods for assessment. A total 43 students sat the final exam producing
some interesting results. The statistical analysis indicated that the correlation
between the MCQCM and the other alternatives ranges from strong to
medium. In addition it appears that the MCQCM demonstrated equal to
slightly stronger convergence of validity compared to the traditional MCQ
method and the other alternative assessment methods.
History
School
University Academic and Administrative Support
Department
Professional Development
Research Unit
CAA Conference
Citation
FARRELL, G., 2006. A comparison of an innovative web-based assessment tool utilizing confidence measurement to the traditional multiple choice, short answer and problem solving questions. IN: Danson, M. (ed.). 10th CAA International Computer Assisted Assessment Conference : Proceedings of the Conference on 4th and 5th July 2006 at Loughborough University. Loughborough : Lougborough University, pp. 195-204