Empowerment means different things to different individuals. The factors that
engender feelings of empowerment and the consequences that ensue are thus
multifarious. Using the Critical Incident Technique (CIT) in semi-structured
interviews with project participants in Hong Kong, the contextual meaning and
consequences of empowerment are explored. Two broad categories of meanings were
ascribed to the concept “empowerment” and related to “what individuals or teams feel
or experience” and “what organisations or leaders do”, confirming the extant
literature’s dichotomous conceptualisation of empowerment into the structural and
psychological perspectives. Positive and negative consequences of empowerment and
disempowerment were evident. The need to capture the different individual
conceptualisations of empowerment in the implementation of empowerment
initiatives is shown and that a contextual fit is essential for empowerment to take
place.
History
School
Architecture, Building and Civil Engineering
Citation
TUULI, M.M. and ROWLINSON, S., 2010. An exploratory study of the contextual meaning and consequences of empowerment in project teams. IN: Laryea, S., Leiringer, R. and Hughes, W. (eds) Proceedings of The West Africa Built Environment Researchers Conference and Workshop (WABER), Accra, Ghana, 27-28 July 2010, pp. 141 - 151.
Publisher
WABER
Version
AM (Accepted Manuscript)
Publication date
2010
Notes
This conference paper was presented at the West Africa Built Environment Research (WABER) Conference, Accra, Ghana, 27-28 July, 2010. The WABER website is at: http://www.waberconference.com/