The engagement of project stakeholders in the design evaluation of
National Health Service (NHS) buildings is critiqued to evaluate the current
effectiveness of NHS policy which prescribes the use of quantitative, positivist survey
instruments to capture stakeholder views. An alternative conceptual framework for
design evaluation is presented that privileges the practice of design evaluation as the
social interaction of project stakeholders. Empirical evidence from two longitudinal
case studies of newly-constructed mental health facilities illustrate the success of this
innovative approach in improving patient healthcare outcomes and reducing operating
costs. It elucidates and enhances both the praxis and practices stimulated by current
approaches to design evaluation. It raises important implications for the future
development of UK Government policy to substantively improve the design quality of
NHS healthcare buildings and, in turn, improve patient healthcare outcomes.
History
School
Architecture, Building and Civil Engineering
Citation
O'KEEFFE, D., THOMSON, D.S. and DAINTY, A.R.J., 2012. Beyond scoring: advancing a new approach to the design evaluation of NHS buildings. IN: Proceedings of the 28th Annual ARCOM Conference, Edinburgh, 3 - 5 September 2012, 10pp.
Publisher
Association of Researchers in Construction Management (ARCOM)
Version
AM (Accepted Manuscript)
Publication date
2012
Notes
This is a conference paper. The publisher's website is at: http://www.arcom.ac.uk/