How do undergraduate mathematics students interpret refutations? We investigated this question by asking participants to 1) decide whether statements are true or false and provide refutations, 2) evaluate counterexamples and ‘correct versions’ of the statements as valid or invalid refutations, and 3) judge which potential refutations are better, explaining why. We report a study in which 173 undergraduate mathematics students completed this task. Results reveal that participants did largely understand the logic of counterexamples but did not reliably understand the broader logic of refutations.
History
School
Science
Department
Mathematics Education Centre
Published in
Proceedings of the 24th Annual Conference on Research in Undergraduate Mathematics Education
Pages
1 - 9
Source
2022 Conference on Research in Undergraduate Mathematics Education
Publisher
The Special Interest Group of the Mathematical Association of America (SIGMAA) for Research in Undergraduate Mathematics Education
This paper was accepted for publication in Proceedings of the 24th Annual Conference on Research in Undergraduate Mathematics Education and the definitive published version is available at http://sigmaa.maa.org/rume/Site/Proceedings.html.