This paper analyses two main renovations of a University building façade retrofit from the viewpoint
of annual daylighting improvement. Currently, this building consists of some teaching rooms connected by a
hall but it is expected that this arrangement will change in order to accommodate two open-plan spaces for
architecture students. The renovated design will increase the height of the North-East windows and introduce
shading devices on the South-West facade. These renovations were explored to determine if the internal
luminous conditions will maintain adequate levels. Five degrees of visual screening (100, 90, 70, 45 and 34%)
and two slats positions (horizontal and vertical) were evaluated in relation to the building with no screens.
Climate-based daylight modelling (CBDM) was carried out by using Diva-for-Grasshopper. The study revealed
that effectiveness of convergence testing depends strongly on the choice of CBDM metrics employed as a
diagnostic – an important consideration when modelling light transfer through louvres. Results recommended
using louvred panels with no more than 70% of visual screening as higher percentages decrease useful
illuminances over the range 300-3000 lux (UDI-a), to less than 50% of the occupancy time. Furthermore,
vertical louvres were better suited to increase UDI-a than horizontal slats.
Funding
Ms. Chi Pool acknowledges the support of CONACYT (Mexico), IUACC (Spain) and Erasmus+;
Ms. Brembilla acknowledges the support of the EPSRC and industrial partner Arup (London,
UK) and Prof. Mardaljevic acknowledges the support of Loughborough University.
History
School
Architecture, Building and Civil Engineering
Published in
Passive Low Energy Architecture (PLEA)
Citation
CHI POOL, D., BREMBILLA, E. and MARDALJEVIC, J., 2017. Evaluation of daylighting performance in a retrofitted building facade. IN: Proceedings of PLEA 2017, Edinburgh, 3rd-5th July 2017.
This work is made available according to the conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0) licence. Full details of this licence are available at: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
Acceptance date
2017-04-24
Publication date
2017
Notes
This paper was presented at PLEA 2017 and is also available at http://plea-arch.org/plea-proceedings/.