posted on 2018-02-12, 15:08authored byDouangchanh Lopaying
Generally, urban water supply provisions are often constructed without consultation with the community concerned through
assessing their affordability or ability to pay (ATP) and willingness to pay (WTP). This is evident in the water supply
system of the study areas for the BTC-funded project towns in Champhone and Laongam. The utilities were unable to set
appropriate water tariffs that were consistent with ATP and WTP. This study investigated and assessed those criteria and
compared them to monthly household income. The ATP for connection is about 51.7% in Champhone and 70.2% in Laongam
and monthly water charge is 2.3% and 4.8% of average household income respectively. The WTP for connection is
about 38.0% and 75.7% with a water charge of 1.5% and 2.4% respectively. Overall, the WTP for monthly water charges
is less than ATP and is less than the amount that is generally assumed (3 - 5% of income).
History
School
Architecture, Building and Civil Engineering
Research Unit
Water, Engineering and Development Centre (WEDC)
Published in
WEDC Conference
Citation
LOPAYING, D., 2004. Household affordability and willingness to pay for water. IN: Godfrey, S. (ed). People-centred approaches to water and environmental sanitation: Proceedings of the 30th WEDC International Conference, Vientiane, Laos, 25-29 October 2004, pp. 199-205.
This work is made available according to the conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0) licence. Full details of this licence are available at: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/