posted on 2013-07-01, 10:23authored byBrian Fildes, Michael Keall, Pete Thomas, Kalle Parkkari, Lucia Pennisi, Claes Tingvall
Real-world evaluations of the safety benefits of
new integrated safety technologies are hampered by
the lack of sufficient data to assess early reliable
benefits. To address this, a new approach was
developed using a case-control, meta-analysis of
coordinated national police data from Australia,
Finland, Italy, New Zealand, Sweden and the UK,
in assessing the benefits of Electronic Stability
Control (ESC). The results showed that singlevehicle
injury crash reductions varied between 21%
and 54%, dependent on the speed zone of the crash
and the road condition (significantly more effective
in wet/icy road conditions than dry roads). For
injury crashes involving more than one vehicle,
ESC was twice as effective preventing crashes in
high speed than lower speed zones. The findings
using this new approach were consistent with those
published by various equivalent individual studies,
bearing in mind their wider international scope in
terms of driving conditions and vehicle fleets
studied. It was concluded that this new approach
using a “prospective” meta-analysis method has the
potential to expedite the process of evaluating
emerging vehicle safety technologies that would
otherwise be subject to much greater delays before
sufficient evidence could be collected.
History
School
Design
Citation
FILDES, B. ... et al., 2013. MUNDS: a new approach to evaluating safety technologies. IN: Proceedings of the 23rd International Technical Conference on the Enhanced Safety of Vehicles (ESV), Seoul, 27-30 May 2013, 15 pp.
Publisher
National Highway Traffic Safety Administration
Version
VoR (Version of Record)
Publication date
2013
Notes
This is a conference paper. The full proceedings of ESV 2013 are freely available at: http://www-nrd.nhtsa.dot.gov/departments/esv/23rd/