posted on 2018-02-12, 15:10authored byChristine Sijbesma, Bondan Sikoki, W. Suriastini, M. Ponsonby
Internationally, there is growing emphasis on evaluations that aim not only at output and performance data but also show the project’s impacts. This paper reports on the experiences, findings and lessons from the impact evaluation of the Second Water and Sanitation for Low Income Communities Project (WSLIC-2) in the Ministry of Health of Indonesia. During project formulation an impact study was planned using the strongest model of a double difference evaluation (differences between before and after situations and practices in project and matched control villages). In this paper, the team that designed and implemented the study reports on the problems and how they were addressed, followed by a brief summary of the findings. It concludes that the classical double difference study is becoming ever harder to practice in development research and suggests ways to address the challenge.
History
School
Architecture, Building and Civil Engineering
Research Unit
Water, Engineering and Development Centre (WEDC)
Published in
WEDC Conference
Citation
SIJBESMA, C. ... et al, 2011. Methodological lessons and findings from an impact evaluation of a WASH project in Indonesia. IN: Shaw, R.J. (ed). The future of water, sanitation and hygiene in low-income countries - Innovation, adaptation and engagement in a changing world: Proceedings of the 35th WEDC International Conference, Loughborough, UK, 6-8 July 2011, 8p.p.
This work is made available according to the conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0) licence. Full details of this licence are available at: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/