posted on 2012-05-10, 12:59authored byVasileios Vernikos, Chris GoodierChris Goodier, Alistair Gibb, P.C. Robery, T.W. Broyd
In the UK civil engineering major roads and rail sectors, novel uses of offsite methods
of construction have commonly "required special approval" by governmental body
approval processes and Codes of Practice. Understanding the ways that such
organisations influence the sector’s confidence regarding innovative construction
methods and materials could help accelerate their development in the design and
construction process, and hence also help maximise the possibilities of modernisation
in the sector. By comparing two case studies of offsite precast concrete underbridge
box-jacking, one as part of a government authority responsible for motorway
contracts and one with a government authority responsible for railways, the
differences regarding prioritisation of acceptable risk are explored. The main drivers
and constraints for offsite adoption and implementation are investigated and
presented. Key challenges during the design and construction period of the projects
are identified. These focus on establishing effective communication between clients,
designers, contractors and offsite suppliers/sub-contractors when implementing
offsite, as well as understanding aspects of the physical integrity of assets that are
dependent on the limitations of essential availability, disruption of usage or closure.
By considering the differences in approach towards innovation and approval systems
for the Governmental approval agencies responsible for motorways and railways, the
parties involved can align their programmes of work and methods to help capacitate
their clients’ needs, facilitating more lean working processes throughout the
procurement, design and construction stages.
History
School
Architecture, Building and Civil Engineering
Citation
VERNIKOS, V.K. ... et al., 2011. Offsite innovation in UK infrastructure: The role of the approvals process in box jacking projects In: Egbu, C. and Lou, E.C.W. (Eds.) Proceedings of the 27th Annual ARCOM Conference, 5-7 September 2011, Bristol, UK, Association of Researchers in Construction Management, pp. 53 - 62.
Publisher
Association of Researchers in Construction Management (ARCOM)
Version
VoR (Version of Record)
Publication date
2011
Notes
This is a conference paper. The publisher's website is at: http://www.arcom.ac.uk/