Digital technologies have the potential to help address some of the key challenges
facing construction. Thinking and planning for the future, including unexpected
events, is vital if the implementation of digital technologies is to realise their benefits.
Four plausible future scenarios for an industry transformation enabled by digital
technologies were developed using scenario-axes approach. The underpinning
empirical work involved a review of literature, 20 semi-structured interviews and five
focus groups/ workshops with industry practitioners. Qualitative data were analysed
to identify emerging themes, which were subsequently conflated to determine the two
main driving forces/ uncertainties underpinning the digitalisation in the industry: the
extent of Innovation, Research and Development (IR&D), and the extent of
integration/ collaboration. They were adopted as two axes to provide a framework to
develop four plausible scenarios, named as ‘bleak segregation’, ‘utopia
transformation’, ‘lonely investment’, and ‘cheap combination’. Feedback from
industry practitioners was generally supportive to the scenarios. The scenarios do not
only describe how external factors impact on digitalisation, but they also raise many
questions on what the industry stakeholders could do to influence the outcomes,
particularly on those related to collaboration and investment. These will determine
the pathways and the level of competitiveness of the industry, the companies and the
individual stakeholders. Based on this, it could be argued that appropriate strategies
and actions of the construction stakeholders themselves can, to a great extent, shape
the future outcomes. Apart from the resulting scenarios, the research highlights the
benefits which could be derived from the process of developing scenarios for the
participants.
Funding
Digital Enablers for CONstruction Transformation (DECONT) project was funded via the Transforming Construction Network Plus.
History
School
Architecture, Building and Civil Engineering
Published in
Proceedings of the 36th Annual ARCOM Conference
Pages
425 - 434
Source
36th Annual ARCOM Conference
Publisher
Association of Researchers in Construction Management (ARCOM)
Version
VoR (Version of Record)
Publisher statement
This paper was was published in the Proceedings of the 36th Annual ARCOM Conference and the definitive published version is available at http://www.arcom.ac.uk/-docs/proceedings/a669fc12a12966c4df71653dd6377a04.pdf