posted on 2015-11-11, 14:40authored byEleonora Brembilla, John Mardaljevic, F. Anselmo
The recent development of climate-based daylight modelling (CBDM) practice led to various
methodologies to perform daylighting evaluations, while its insertion in new guidelines created
the need of common procedures and verified frameworks.
This paper aims to give an insight into the relation between the analysis grid and time-step
settings and the reliability of an annual climate-based daylight simulation performed with distinct
methods. CBDM is a rapidly evolving practice, and the evaluation reflects that by including several
different state-of-the-art software tools in the overall comparison. The space under analysis is a
real case study classroom where the monitoring of the luminous environment is being conducted
for a parallel research.
The results, expressed as annual exposure, Useful Daylight Illuminance (UDI) and Daylight
Autonomy (DA), show a good agreement between most of the tools and delineate some minimum
requirements on the input accuracy for the considered space, in terms of grid resolution, time
step and sky vault discretisation.
History
School
Architecture, Building and Civil Engineering
Published in
28th Session of the CIE
Citation
BREMBILLA, E., MARDALJEVIC, J. and ANSELMO, F., 2015. The effect of the analysis grid on daylight simulations with climate-based daylight modelling. Presented at: The 28th Session of the International Commission on Illumination: CIE 2015, 28th June-4th July 2015, Manchester.
Publisher
Commission Internationale de l'Eclairage
Version
AM (Accepted Manuscript)
Publisher statement
This work is made available according to the conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0) licence. Full details of this licence are available at: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
Publication date
2015
Notes
This conference paper is available here with the kind permission of the publisher.