<p dir="ltr">This study contributes to research on the impact of questions on students’ reading of mathematics and informs design considerations for questions included in workbooks. We used eye-tracking complemented by open-text questions. Participants were engineering and science students from the first to the third year of their studies. We considered proceduralness, conceptualness, and difficulty as dimensions of the workbook questions. We found that what we call a ‘conceptual question’ triggered more attention to the explanation than the example part of the workbook text, but so did what we call the ‘procedural question’. In addition, relative question difficulty may have influenced our results. An implication of our findings is the need to investigate the interrelations of the conceptualness and proceduralness of mathematical questions while also considering the role of questions’ relative difficulty.<br><br></p>
History
School
Science
Department
Mathematics Education
Published in
Proceedings of the 27th Annual Conference on Research in Undergraduate Mathematics Education
Pages
269 - 276
Source
The 27th Annual Conference on Research in Undergraduate Mathematics Education
Publisher
The Special Interest Group of the Mathematical Association of America (SIGMAA) for Research in Undergraduate Mathematics Education
This paper was accepted for publication in Proceedings of the 27th Annual Conference on Research in Undergraduate Mathematics Education and the definitive published version is available at http://sigmaa.maa.org/rume/Site/Proceedings.html.