Loughborough University
Browse

Variations in surface hardness in response to simulated traffic between stabilized cool-season turf systems

Download (961.56 kB)
conference contribution
posted on 2024-09-26, 13:41 authored by Jake Kilby, Ryan Bearss, Jackie Lyn Guevara, Evan Rogers, John N. Rogers III, Rhys Fielder, Conlan Burbrink, Ivan Navarette, Taylor Williams, Kyley Dickson, John C. Sorochan

Engineering of Sport 15 - Proceedings from the 15th International Conference on the Engineering of Sport (ISEA 2024)

The surface hardness of a sports field is commonly measured to describe the resilience and shock absorbing properties of a playing surface. It is also perceived by athletesto have a strong association with increased risk of injury on artificial turf systems. Thresholds for surface hardness vary by sport. American football for example, requires all athletic surfaces to register a hardness less than 100 gmax, while FIFA prescribes a hardness of natural pitch surfaces between 70-85 gmax. Several devices for determining playing surface safety have been used to quantify surface hardness, however; the Clegg impact soil tester (CIST) remains the most widely utilized method. Originally used as a proctor test of roadways [3], the CIST has since been adopted by turf managers to determine safety by means of hardness, of a playing surface. In thisstudy, the surface hardness between two cool-season hybrid-stabilized turf systems were compared over a well-graded sand root zone. This study was conducted to build upon the body of knowledge surrounding playing surface recommendations for the 2026 FIFA World Cup. 

History

Usage metrics

    Mechanical, Electrical and Manufacturing Engineering

    Categories

    No categories selected

    Licence

    Exports

    RefWorks
    BibTeX
    Ref. manager
    Endnote
    DataCite
    NLM
    DC