Loughborough University
Browse

Artificial Symbol Learning With Training - Experiment 1 Data analysis

Download (8.85 MB)
dataset
posted on 2025-01-16, 12:42 authored by Camilla GilmoreCamilla Gilmore, Hanna Weiers, Matthew InglisMatthew Inglis

Zip file containing all data and analysis files for Experiment 1 in:

Weiers, H., Inglis, M., & Gilmore, C. (under review). Learning artificial number symbols with ordinal and magnitude information.

Article abstract

The question of how numerical symbols gain semantic meaning is a key focus of mathematical cognition research. Some have suggested that symbols gain meaning from magnitude information, by being mapped onto the approximate number system, whereas others have suggested symbols gain meaning from their ordinal relations to other symbols. Here we used an artificial symbol learning paradigm to investigate the effects of magnitude and ordinal information on number symbol learning. Across two experiments, we found that after either magnitude or ordinal training, adults successfully learned novel symbols and were able to infer their ordinal and magnitude meanings. Furthermore, adults were able to make relatively accurate judgements about, and map between, the novel symbols and non-symbolic quantities (dot arrays). Although both ordinal and magnitude training was sufficient to attach meaning to the symbols, we found beneficial effects on the ability to learn and make numerical judgements about novel symbols when combining small amounts of magnitude information for a symbol subset with ordinal information about the whole set. These results suggest that a combination of magnitude and ordinal information is a plausible account of the symbol learning process.

© The Authors

Funding

Royal Society RGF/EA/180254

Royal Society Dorothy Hodgkin Fellowship

History

School

  • Science

Department

  • Mathematics Education

Usage metrics

    Mathematics Education

    Exports

    RefWorks
    BibTeX
    Ref. manager
    Endnote
    DataCite
    NLM
    DC