Loughborough University
Browse
1/1
2 files

Comparison of Smart Water-filled Glass (SWFG), Water-filled Glass (WFG) and conventional windows /energy savings, CO2 emissions and economic value/

Version 2 2020-09-10, 08:37
Version 1 2020-07-13, 08:47
dataset
posted on 2020-09-10, 08:37 authored by Matyas GutaiMatyas Gutai, Abolfazl Ganji Kheybari
Dataset showing the energy savings, CO2 emissions and economic value of Smart Water-filled Glass-SWFG /water-filled glass with changing opacity/, Water-filled Glass-WFG in comparison with conventional windows (double glass w. no shading, double glass w. automated shading, double glass w. permanent shading, double glass w. low SHGC, triple glass, electrochromic window).
Data presents the results in 7 cities: Singapore, Dubai, Abu Dhabi, Torrance (USA), New York, Shanghai and Beijing.

Version 1.0: Comparison of WFG and SWFG with 6 Base Cases (one electrochromic case)
Version 2.0: Comparison of WFG and SWFG with 7 Base Cases (two electrochromic cases: 2 settings and 4 settings)

History

School

  • Architecture, Building and Civil Engineering