Supplementary information files for "Inadequacy of fluvial energetics for describing gravity current autosuspension"
Supplementary files for article "Inadequacy of fluvial energetics for describing gravity current autosuspension"
Gravity currents, such as sediment-laden turbidity currents, are ubiquitous natural flows that are driven by a density difference. Turbidity currents have provided vital motivation to advance understanding of this class of flows because their enigmatic long run-out and driving mechanisms are not properly understood. Extant models assume that material transport by gravity currents is dynamically similar to fluvial flows. Here, empirical research from different types of particle-driven gravity currents is integrated with our experimental data, to show that material transport is fundamentally different from fluvial systems. Contrary to current theory, buoyancy production is shown to have a non-linear dependence on available flow power, indicating an underestimation of the total kinetic energy lost from the mean flow. A revised energy budget directly implies that the mixing efficiency of gravity currents is enhanced.
©The Author(s) CC BY 4.0
Funding
Supported by the Turbidites Research Group, University of Leeds funded by AkerBP, CNOOC group, ConocoPhillips, Murphy Oil, OMV, Occidental Petroleum
The, statistically-Unsteady, Next generation Sediment Transport model for Environmental flows
Natural Environment Research Council
Find out more...Supported by the European Research Council under the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme [grant 725955]
Leverhulme Trust, Leverhulme Early Career Researcher Fellowship [grant ECF-2020-679]
History
School
- Social Sciences and Humanities