Loughborough University
Browse
1/1
3 files

Supplementary information files for The facilitators and barriers to improving functional activity and wellbeing in people with dementia: A qualitative study from the Process Evaluation of Promoting Activity, Independence and Stability in Early Dementia (PrAISED)

dataset
posted on 2023-09-04, 11:45 authored by Claudio Di Lorito, Veronika Van der Wardt, Kristian Pollock, Louise Howe, Vicky Booth, Pip Logan, John Gladman, Tahir Masud, Roshan das Nair, Sarah Goldberg, Kavita Vedhara, Rebecca O'Brien, Emma Adams, Alison Cowley, Alessandro Bosco, Jennie HancoxJennie Hancox, Clare Burgon, Rupinder Bajwa, Juliette Lock, Annabelle Long, Maureen Godfrey,, Marianne Dunlop, Rowan H. Harwood

Supplementary files for article The facilitators and barriers to improving functional activity and wellbeing in people with dementia: A qualitative study from the Process Evaluation of Promoting Activity, Independence and Stability in Early Dementia (PrAISED)

Background. The PRomoting Activity, Independence and Stability in Early Dementia (PrAISED) study delivered an exercise and functional activity programme to participants living with dementia. A Randomised Controlled Trial (RCT) showed no measurable benefits in activities of daily living, physical activity or quality of life.

Objective. To explore participants’ responses to PrAISED and explain why an intervention that might be expected to have produced measurable health gains did not do so.

Methods. A process evaluation using qualitative methods, comprising interviews and researcher notes

Setting. Data were collected in participants’ homes or remotely by telephone or videoconferencing.

Sample. Eighty-eight interviews were conducted with 44 participants living with dementia (n = 32 intervention group; n = 12 control group) and 39 caregivers. Sixty-nine interviews were conducted with 26 therapists.

Results. Participants valued the intervention as proactively addressing health issues that were of concern to them, and as sources of social contact, interaction, information, and advice. Facilitators to achieving positive outcomes included perceiving progress toward desired goals, positive expectations, therapists’ skills and rapport with participants, and caregiver support. Barriers included: cognitive impairment, which prevented independent engagement and carryover between sessions; chronic physical health problems and intercurrent acute illness and injury; ‘tapering’ (progressively infrequent supervision intended to help develop habits and independent activity); and the COVID-19 pandemic.

Conclusions. Self-directed interventions may not be appropriate in the context of dementia, even in the mild stages of the condition. Dementia-specific factors affected outcomes including caregiver support, rapport with therapists, availability of supervision, motivational factors, and the limitations of remote delivery. The effects of cognitive impairment, multimorbidity and frailty overwhelmed any positive impact of the intervention. Maintenance of functional ability is valued, but in the face of inevitable progression of disease, other less tangible outcomes become important, challenging how we frame ‘health gain’ and trial outcomes.

Funding

National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) under its Programme Grants for Applied Research Programme (Reference Number RP-PG-0614- 20007)

History

School

  • Sport, Exercise and Health Sciences

Usage metrics

    Sport, Exercise and Health Sciences

    Exports

    RefWorks
    BibTeX
    Ref. manager
    Endnote
    DataCite
    NLM
    DC