Loughborough University
Browse

Supplementary information files for "When are fact-checks effective? An experimental study on the inclusion of the misinformation source and the source of fact-checks in 16 European countries"

Download (666.38 kB)
dataset
posted on 2025-06-13, 13:01 authored by Patrick F. A. van Erkel, Peter van Aelst, Claes H. de Vreese, David N. Hopmann, Jörg Matthes, Nicoleta Corbu, James StanyerJames Stanyer

Supplementary files for article "When are fact-checks effective? An experimental study on the inclusion of the misinformation source and the source of fact-checks in 16 European countries"

Despite increasing academic attention, several questions about fact-checking remain unanswered. First, it remains unclear to what extent fact-checks are effective across different political and media contexts. Second, we know little on whether features of the fact-check itself influence its success. Conducting an experiment in 16 European countries, this study aims to fill these gaps by examining two features of fact-checks that may affect their success: whether fact-checks include the political source of the misinformation, and the source of the fact-check itself. We find that fact-checks are successful in debunking misperceptions. Moreover, this debunking effect is consistent across countries. Looking at features of fact-checks, we find no indication that it matters whether fact-checks include the political source of the misinformation claim. Comparing fact-checks from independent organizations with those from public broadcasters, we do find, however, that who the fact-checker is matters, especially in combination with trust in this source.

© The Author(s), CC BY-NC-ND 4.0

Funding

European Commission through Horizon 2020 under grant agreement No [822166]

The Threatpie project

History

School

  • Social Sciences and Humanities

Usage metrics

    Communication and Media

    Exports

    RefWorks
    BibTeX
    Ref. manager
    Endnote
    DataCite
    NLM
    DC