A qualitative investigation of foundation year 2 doctors’ views on the European Working Time Directive
journal contributionposted on 11.11.2015 by Myanna Duncan, Cheryl Haslam
Any type of content formally published in an academic journal, usually following a peer-review process.
© Emerald Group Publishing Limited. Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to examine the personal views and experiences of Foundation Year 2 doctors operating under the European Working Time Directive (EWTD). Design/methodology/approach – In total, 36 Foundation Year 2 doctors from a single UK-based Deanery participated in this semistructured interview study. Findings – Findings indicated that Foundation doctors typically welcomed a regulation of working hours, but reported frustration at the manner in which the Directive had been implemented. Participants reported concerns at reducing hours by removing out-of-hours working in order to meet EWTD requirements. Out-of-hours shifts were highly valued owing to their increased opportunities for autonomous clinical decision making. By contrast, day-shifts were regarded as heavily administrative in nature and were perceived as service provision. Foundation doctors discussed the unique nature of the out-of-hours working period which appeared to provide specific learning opportunities as doctors draw on time management and prioritisation skills. Originality/value – Given the challenges the EWTD presents, careful rota planning is essential. First, the authors would encourage the restructuring of day-shift work to provide a greater emphasis on hands-on skills experience in a supportive, supervised environment. Second, where possible, Foundation doctors might benefit from the opportunity to engage in some out-of-hours working, such as with multi-professional “Hospital at Night” teams. Third, the authors would encourage junior doctor involvement in rota design and planning which may increase their perceived autonomy and therefore buy-in of working practices.
- Sport, Exercise and Health Sciences