Kryger et al. (2016) comfort vs pp IRversion.pdf (208.92 kB)
0/0

Can subjective comfort be used as a measure of plantar pressure in football boots?

Download (208.92 kB)
journal contribution
posted on 12.09.2016 by Katrine Okholm Kryger, Vicky Jarratt, Sean Mitchell, Steph Forrester
© 2016 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis GroupComfort has been shown to be the most desired football boot feature by players. Previous studies have shown discomfort to be related to increased plantar pressures for running shoes which, in some foot regions, has been suggested to be a causative factor in overuse injuries. This study examined the correlation between subjective comfort data and objective plantar pressure for football boots during football-specific drills. Eight male university football players were tested. Plantar pressure data were collected during four football-specific movements for each of three different football boots. The global and local peak pressures based on a nine-sectioned foot map were compared to subjective comfort measures recorded using a visual analogue scale for global discomfort and a discomfort foot map for local discomfort. A weak (rs = −0.126) yet significant (P < 0.05) correlation was shown between the peak plantar pressure experienced and the visual analogue scale rated comfort. The model only significantly predicted (P > 0.001) the outcome for two (medial and lateral forefoot) of the nine foot regions. Subjective comfort data is therefore not a reliable measure of increased plantar pressures for any foot region. The use of plantar pressure measures is therefore needed to optimise injury prevention when designing studded footwear.

History

School

  • Mechanical, Electrical and Manufacturing Engineering

Published in

Journal of Sports Sciences

Pages

1 - 7

Citation

OKHOLM KRYGER, K. ... et al, 2016. Can subjective comfort be used as a measure of plantar pressure in football boots? Journal of Sports Sciences, 35 (10), pp. 953-959.

Publisher

© Taylor & Francis

Version

AM (Accepted Manuscript)

Publisher statement

This work is made available according to the conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0) licence. Full details of this licence are available at: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/

Acceptance date

22/06/2016

Publication date

2016

Notes

This is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis in Journal of Sports Sciences on 11 July 2016, available online: http://www.tandfonline.com/10.1080/02640414.2016.1206661.

ISSN

0264-0414

eISSN

1466-447X

Language

en

Exports

Logo branding

Keyword(s)

Exports