Extreme case (re)formulation as a practice for making hearably racist talk repairable
journal contributionposted on 23.03.2016 by Jessica Robles
Any type of content formally published in an academic journal, usually following a peer-review process.
This article investigates the interactional organization of racism through participant production and uptake of explicit racial membership categories across a corpus of 50+ hours of audio-/video-recorded interaction in three U.S. states. The discourse analysis examines one participant method for addressing “hearably racist” talk: echoing extreme versions of the problematic utterance to provide opportunities for repair work on inferable associations between membership categories and category-bound activities. Orienting to implicit inferential material as the source of trouble licenses participant account-seeking; treating the racism as a repairable downgrades its status as an overt instance of racism.
- Social Sciences
- Communication, Media, Social and Policy Studies