Reply to Moisio and Harle from Marco version 3_to upload.pdf (41.54 kB)

In defense of "geopolitical remote sensing": reply to Moisio and Harle

Download (41.54 kB)
journal contribution
posted on 23.10.2014 by Marco Antonsich
The author of a recently published paper on Finland's identity politics and national identity (Antonsich, 2005) responds to comments presented in the preceding paper in this issue of Eurasian Geography and Economics (Moisio and Harle, 2006). The rejoinder focuses on the nature of place knowledge acquired "in place" versus "at distance" as well as on more specific differences in perspective (e.g., use of sources, terminology, critical geopolitcs). Copyright © 2006 by V. H. Winston & Son, Inc. All rights reserved.

History

School

  • Social Sciences

Department

  • Geography and Environment

Published in

Eurasian Geography and Economics

Volume

47

Issue

2

Pages

211 - 215

Citation

ANTONSICH, M., 2006. In defense of "geopolitical remote sensing": reply to Moisio and Harle. Eurasian Geography and Economics, 47 (2), pp.211-215.

Publisher

Routledge (© V. H. Winston & Son, Inc)

Version

SMUR (Submitted Manuscript Under Review)

Publisher statement

This work is made available according to the conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0) licence. Full details of this licence are available at: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/

Publication date

2006

Notes

This is an Submitted Manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis Group in Eurasian Geography and Economics on 15/05/2013 available online: http://www.tandfonline.com/10.2747/1538-7216.47.2.211

ISSN

1538-7216

Language

en

Exports