Investigating and improving undergraduate proof comprehension
journal contributionposted on 11.05.2015 by Lara Alcock, Mark Hodds, S. Roy, Matthew Inglis
Any type of content formally published in an academic journal, usually following a peer-review process.
Undergraduate mathematics students see a lot of written proofs. But how much do they learn from them? Perhaps not as much as we would like – every professor knows that students struggle to make sense of the proofs presented in lectures and textbooks. Of course, written proofs are only one resource for learning; students also attend lectures and work, independently or with support, on problems. But, because mathematics majors are expected to learn much of their mathematics by studying proofs, it is important that we understand how to support them in reading and understanding mathematical arguments. This observation was the starting point for the research reported in this article. Our work uses psychological research methods to generate and analyse empirical evidence on mathematical thinking, in this case via experimental studies of teaching interventions and quantitative analyses of eye-‐movement data. What follows is a chronological account of three stages in our attempts to better understand students’ mathematical reading processes and to support students in learning to read effectively.
The present article draws on work supported by the Royal Society and by the Higher Education Academy’s Maths, Stats & OR Network.
- Mathematics Education Centre