Rejoinder_Elden_territory revised.pdf (31.05 kB)

Rethinking territory

Download (31.05 kB)
journal contribution
posted on 23.10.2014, 10:17 by Marco Antonsich
This critical commentary engages, both methodologically and theoretically, the notion of territory as discussed by Stuart Elden (2010). Methodologically, I suggest that Elden's philological concern with the term 'territory' rather than with the idea of 'bounded political space' risks producing a partial historical account. As a way to enlarge the scope of analysis and include also forms of 'bounded political spaces' which existed before, during, and after the emergence of modern territory, I propose a new theoretical category, 'territorial'. This category reinstates the importance of 'b-ordering' practices, downgraded as second-order problem by Elden. Theoretically, the commentary also suggests the importance of 'peopling' territory, in order to bring social agency back in and avoiding treating modern territory as a mere terror(izing) tool. Prompted by Elden's account, this piece aims to stimulate a 'territory debate'.

History

School

  • Social Sciences

Department

  • Geography and Environment

Published in

Progress in Human Geography

Volume

35

Issue

3

Pages

422 - 425

Citation

ANTONSICH, M., 2011. Rethinking territory. Progress in Human Geography, 35 (3), pp.422-425.

Publisher

Sage (© The authors)

Version

AM (Accepted Manuscript)

Publisher statement

This work is made available according to the conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0) licence. Full details of this licence are available at: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/

Publication date

2011

Notes

This is the submitted version of an article published in the journal Progress in Human Geography. The final published version is available online at http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0309132510385619

ISSN

0309-1325

eISSN

1477-0288

Language

en

Exports

Logo branding

Keywords

Exports