Rhetoric of derisive laughter_DemasiTileagaQP.pdf (302.6 kB)

Rhetoric of derisive laughter in political debates on the EU

Download (302.6 kB)
journal contribution
posted on 10.04.2019 by Mirko A. Demasi, Cristian Tileaga
This paper focuses on the argumentative role of derisive laughter in broadcast political debates. Using Discursive Psychology (DP) we analyse how politicians use derisive laughter as an argumentative resource in multi-party interactions, in the form of debates about the UK and the European Union. Specifically, we explore how both pro- and anti-EU politicians use derisive laughter to manage issues of who-knows-what and who-knows-better. We demonstrate the uses of derisive laughter by focusing on two discrete, yet pervasive, interactional phenomena in our data – extended laughter sequences and snorts. We argue that in the context of political debates derisive laughter does more than signal trouble and communicate contempt; it is, more than often, mobilized in the service of ideological argumentation and used as a form of challenge to factual claims.

History

School

  • Social Sciences

Department

  • Communication, Media, Social and Policy Studies

Published in

Qualitative Psychology

Citation

DEMASI, M.A. and TILEAGA, C., 2019. Rhetoric of derisive laughter in political debates on the EU. Qualitative Psychology, doi:10.1037/qup0000156.

Publisher

© American Psychological Association

Version

AM (Accepted Manuscript)

Publisher statement

© American Psychological Association, 2019. This paper is not the copy of record and may not exactly replicate the authoritative document published in the APA journal. Please do not copy or cite without author's permission. The final article is available, upon publication, at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/qup0000156.

Acceptance date

04/04/2019

Publication date

2019

ISSN

2326-3601

eISSN

2326-3598

Language

en

Exports

Logo branding

Keyword(s)

Exports