Dainty_The Zero Paradox Post-Review Final for Submission.pdf (74.13 kB)
0/0

UK construction safety: a zero paradox?

Download (74.13 kB)
journal contribution
posted on 27.03.2017 by F. Sherratt, Andrew Dainty
The zero accident mantra has become embedded within the safety discourse of large UK construction organisations. A critique has emerged around this phenomenon and its alignment with outmoded ‘Safety I’ thinking, a consequence of the dominant focus on accident causality. But the extent to which zero-focused approaches yield reductions in accident frequency is yet to be empirically investigated. By way of an evidence-based critique, we examine the relationship between major accidents and zero approaches by drawing on Health and Safety Executive accident data over a 4 year period, together with an analysis of major contractors’ safety approaches. This reveals that working on a project subject to a zero safety policy or programme actually appears to slightly increase the likelihood of having a serious life-changing accident or fatality; a possible ‘zero paradox’. Although these findings should be treated with caution, they suggest that the apparent trend towards abandoning zero amongst some large organisations is well-founded. More pointedly, if zero policies are closing down opportunities to learn and innovate while simultaneously failing to yield reductions in serious accident rates, then this suggests a need to discard this discourse in favour of more contingent perspectives on safe working.

History

School

  • Architecture, Building and Civil Engineering

Published in

Policy and Practice in Health and Safety

Citation

SHERRATT, F. and DAINTY, A.R.J., 2017. UK construction safety: a zero paradox? Policy and Practice in Health and Safety, 15 (2), pp. 108-116.

Publisher

© Taylor & Francis

Version

AM (Accepted Manuscript)

Publisher statement

This work is made available according to the conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0) licence. Full details of this licence are available at: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/

Acceptance date

08/03/2017

Publication date

2017

Notes

This is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis in Policy and Practice in Health and Safety on 22 March 2017, available online: http://www.tandfonline.com/10.1080/14773996.2017.1305040.

ISSN

1477-4003;1477-3996

Language

en

Exports

Logo branding

Exports