What counts as ‘the evidence’? A need for an urgent review of injury risk in school rugby
journal contributionposted on 09.01.2018 by Joe Piggin, Alan Bairner
Any type of content formally published in an academic journal, usually following a peer-review process.
In March 2016, an open letter called for the removal of tackling in school rugby union. In response, the Chief Medical Officers (CMOs) of the UK consulted, gathered evidence and continued with the status quo – they endorsed tackling in school rugby. The CMOs stated that ‘the evidence does not support the conclusions and recommendations laid out in [the] open letter.’ The CMOs relied on a report from the UK Physical Activity Expert Group (PAEG) and a review article by Dr Ross Tucker and colleagues in the BJSM. We highlight 5 problems with the evidence that the CMOs used to make their decision stemming from a report to the CMOs by the Physical Activity Expert Group (PAEG).
- Sport, Exercise and Health Sciences