posted on 2017-07-21, 09:55authored byJenny Coombs, Mandy Thomas, Nathan RushNathan Rush, Elizabeth Martin
A Community of Practice approach to delivering research support services in a post-92
higher education institution: a reflective case study The need for research support in UK universities is growing at a fast pace and a number of different professional and academic units within universities are involved in the process. This case study takes place in a post-92 higher education institution and discusses the benefit of utilising a cross-university Community of Practice (CoP) approach to delivering research support services. It takes a qualitative approach, using semi-structured interviews to ascertain
the personal experiences of community members. The article’s key findings for successful implementation include a common sense of purpose; a shared concern or passion about the research agenda; a sense of community and belonging; trust; a safe environment; and senior management support. Added benefit is demonstrated by enhanced staff knowledge, increased job satisfaction and profile raising of the Library and Learning Service. The findings can help libraries in similar positions to use collaborative
initiatives to develop research support services.
History
School
University Academic and Administrative Support
Department
University Library
Published in
New Review of Academic Librarianship
Volume
23
Issue
2-3
Pages
159-170
Citation
COOMBS, J. ...et al., 2017. A Community of Practice approach to delivering research support services in a post-92 higher education institution: a reflective case study. New Review of Academic Librarianship, 23 (2-3), pp. 159-170.
This work is made available according to the conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0) licence. Full details of this licence are available at: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
Acceptance date
2017-05-17
Publication date
2017-06-09
Notes
This is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis in New Review of Academic Librarianship on 19 May 2017, available online: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13614533.2017.1329750.