Reed_15270025211022243.pdf (800.32 kB)
A comparative analysis of competitive balance between a closed and an open league in rugby league
journal contribution
posted on 2021-09-16, 13:24 authored by Daniel ReadDaniel Read, Aaron SmithAaron Smith, James SkinnerLeague regulators aim for an equitable competition where each team has an equal chance of winning the championship, termed competitive balance. It is generally assumed that closed leagues with stricter labor market regulations should demonstrate better competitive balance than open leagues with promotion and relegation. The aim of this research was to examine the competitive balance between and within seasons in the closed Australian National Rugby League (NRL) and open English Super League using five measures of concentration and dominance. Overall, the closed NRL competition demonstrated superior competitive balance. The practical and theoretical implications of the findings are discussed.
History
School
- Loughborough University London
Published in
Journal of Sports EconomicsVolume
22Issue
8Pages
871-892Publisher
SageVersion
- VoR (Version of Record)
Rights holder
© The authorsPublisher statement
This is an Open Access Article. It is published by Sage under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International Licence (CC BY-NC). Full details of this licence are available at: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/Acceptance date
2021-05-03Publication date
2021-06-29Copyright date
2021ISSN
1527-0025eISSN
1552-7794Publisher version
Language
- en
Depositor
Prof Aaron Smith. Deposit date: 13 September 2021Article number
ARTN 15270025211022243Usage metrics
Categories
No categories selectedKeywords
uncertainty of outcomecompetition regulationHerfindahl indexrugby leagueSocial SciencesEconomicsHospitality, Leisure, Sport & TourismBusiness & EconomicsSocial Sciences - Other TopicsGAME OUTCOME UNCERTAINTYPROFESSIONAL FOOTBALLPECULIAR ECONOMICSSTADIUM ATTENDANCESPORTSDEMANDBASEBALLPLAYERSPOLICYOther EconomicsCommercial Services