posted on 2011-01-12, 11:07authored byHesham A. Bassioni
Performance measurement has become evermore critical to business success and
has been subject to a considerable amount of research and attention over the past
two decades The inadequacy of traditional financially based performance
measurement and the introduction of non-financial measures have been the
triggers for much of this research and attention. Moreover, the Egan and Latham
reports have advocated performance improvement in the construction industry,
with performance measurement being a key element. Many frameworks and tools
have been developed to address the recent advancements in the area. The
frameworks / tools most utilised in the UK construction industry are the Key
Performance Indicators (KPI), the European Foundation for Quality Management
(EFQM) Excellence Model, and the Balanced Scorecard. Other frameworks have
been utilised in other countries, such as the Baldrige Excellence Model in the
USA, and further frameworks exist in literature. Construction companies have had
to face the dilemma of choosing among the different performance measurement
frameworks / tools available, or face the confusion that can be caused by using
more than one simultaneously. Hence, the aim of this research is to develop a
framework that measures business performance in a more comprehensive manner.
The scope of the research is to focus on construction contracting organisations, as
a proof of concept, with possible future modifications / generalisations to other
types of construction companies. An analysis of the gaps in knowledge in
business performance measurement, conducted based on the literature review,
came to confirm the need for this research. A `Construction Strategy Map' was devised to measure strategic performance in
the framework, based on the strategy map feature of the Balanced Scorecard but
adapted for construction contracting organisations. An illustrative case study was
presented to show how the Construction Strategy Map was used to develop an
organisational strategy map in a major UK contracting organisation. Another tool
for measuring excellence performance in the framework, the `Construction
Excellence Model', was also devised, and based on the initial hybrid framework
previously developed in this research. A statistical analysis was used to confirm
the model that addressed the issues of reliability and validity of the questionnaire
survey as a measuring instrument, evaluated the criteria and sub-criteria of the
model using confidence intervals and factor analysis, and computed empirical
weights of the model criteria using factor regression coefficients. The
performance measurement framework in its entirety, as well as its components
(the integrated methodology, the Construction Strategy Map, and the Construction Excellence Model) were validated through expert feedback. The framework was
further evaluated in terms of performance measurement frameworks in business
and construction management literature and the performance improvement
techniques of six sigma, lean construction, knowledge management and
sustainable construction, to strengthen its external validity. Finally, the
conclusions, benefits and limitations of the framework, recommendations to
industry and possible further work in research were discussed.