Loughborough University
Browse

A new framework for evaluating dust emission model development using dichotomous satellite observations of dust emission

Download (5.41 MB)
journal contribution
posted on 2024-01-04, 10:53 authored by Mark Hennen, Adrian Chappell, Nicholas Webb, Kerstin Schepanski, Matthew BaddockMatthew Baddock, Frank Eckardt, Tarek Kandakji, Jeffrey Lee, Mohamad Nobakht, Johanna von Holdt

Dust models are essential for understanding the impact of mineral dust on Earth’s systems, human health, and global economies, but dust emission modelling has large uncertainties. Satellite observations of dust emission point sources (DPS) provide a valuable dichotomous inventory of regional dust emissions. We develop a framework for evaluating dust emission model performance using existing DPS data before routine calibration of dust models. To illustrate this framework’s utility and arising insights, we evaluated the albedo-based dust emission model (AEM) with its areal (MODIS 500 m) estimates of soil surface wind friction velocity (us*) and common, poorly constrained grain-scale entrainment threshold (u*ts) adjusted by a function of soil moisture (H). The AEM simulations are reduced to its frequency of occurrence, P(us* > u*tsH). The spatio-temporal variability in observed dust emission frequency is described by the collation of nine existing DPS datasets. Observed dust emission occurs rarely, even in North Africa and the Middle East, where DPS frequency averages 1.8 %, (~7 days y− 1), indicating extreme, large wind speed events. The AEM coincided with observed dust emission ~71.4 %, but simulated dust emission ~27.4 % when no dust emission was observed, while dust emission occurrence was over-estimated by up to 2 orders of magnitude. For estimates to match observations, results showed that grain-scale u*ts needed restricted sediment supply and compatibility with areal us*. Failure to predict dust emission during observed events, was due to us* being too small because reanalysis winds (ERA5-Land) were averaged across 11 km pixels, and inconsistent with us* across 0.5 km pixels representing local maxima. Assumed infinite sediment supply caused the AEM to simulate dust emission whenever P(us*>u*tsH), producing false positives when wind speeds were large. The dust emission model scales of existing parameterisations need harmonising and a new parameterisation for u*ts is required to restrict sediment supply over space and time.

Funding

USA National Science Foundation (EAR-1853853)

Collaborative Research: NSFGEO-NERC: Aeolian dust responses to regional ecosystem change

Natural Environment Research Council

Find out more...

History

School

  • Social Sciences and Humanities

Department

  • Geography and Environment

Published in

Science of The Total Environment

Volume

912

Publisher

Elsevier

Version

  • VoR (Version of Record)

Rights holder

© The Authors

Publisher statement

This is an Open Access Article. It is published by Elsevier under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International Licence (CC BY). Full details of this licence are available at: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

Acceptance date

2023-12-07

Publication date

2023-12-13

Copyright date

2023

ISSN

0048-9697

eISSN

1879-1026

Language

  • en

Depositor

Dr Matthew Baddock. Deposit date: 21 December 2023

Article number

169237

Usage metrics

    Loughborough Publications

    Categories

    No categories selected

    Licence

    Exports

    RefWorks
    BibTeX
    Ref. manager
    Endnote
    DataCite
    NLM
    DC