Loughborough University
Browse

A policy-level perspective to tackle rural digital inclusion

Download (404.74 kB)
journal contribution
posted on 2021-09-22, 08:03 authored by Sharon Wagg, Boyka Simeonova
<p>Purpose</p> <p>This paper explores how policy-level stakeholders tackle digital inclusion in the context of UK rural communities.</p> <p>Design/methodology/approach</p> <p>Semi-structured interviews were conducted with stakeholders that operate nationally in government departments, government funded organisations and third sector organisations that provided a policy-level perspective on digital inclusion initiative provision across England, Scotland and Wales. Activity theory (AT) was utilised as a theoretical framework, where a variety of factors–tools, rules, community, division of labour and contradictions–were found to have an influence on digital inclusion initiative provision.</p> <p>Findings</p> <p>Digital inclusion initiative provision in UK rural communities is organised through the multi-stakeholder involvement of national organisations, and collaboration with intermediary organisations to provide digital skills training and support. The process is fraught with difficulties and contradictions, limited knowledge sharing; reduced or poor-quality connectivity; lack of funding; lack of local resources; assumptions that organisations will indeed collaborate and assumptions that intermediary organisations have staff with the necessary skills and confidence to provide digital skills training and support within the rural context.</p> <p>Research limitations/implications</p> <p>This study highlights the benefit of using AT as a lens to develop a nuanced understanding of how policy-level stakeholders tackle digital inclusion.</p> <p>Practical implications</p> <p>This study can inform policy decisions on digital inclusion initiative provision suitable for rural communities.</p> <p>Originality/value</p> <p>The contribution of this paper provides new insights into the understanding of how policy-level stakeholders tackle digital inclusion and the provision of digital inclusion initiatives; it builds on the use of AT to help unpick the complexity of digital inclusion initiative provision as a phenomenon; it reveals contradictions in relation to trust, and the need for knowledge sharing mechanisms to span and align different interpretations of digital inclusion across the policy-level; and reveals an extension of AT demonstrated through the “granularity of the subject” which enables the multi-actor involvement of the stakeholders involved in digital inclusion at policy-level to emerge.</p>

History

Related Materials

School

  • Business and Economics

Department

  • Business

Published in

Information Technology and People

Volume

35

Issue

7

Pages

1884-1911

Publisher

Emerald Publishing Limited

Version

  • AM (Accepted Manuscript)

Rights holder

© Emerald Publishing Limited

Publisher statement

This paper was accepted for publication in the journal Information Technology and People and the definitive published version is available at https://doi.org/10.1108/ITP-01-2020-0047. This author accepted manuscript is deposited under a Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC) licence. This means that anyone may distribute, adapt, and build upon the work for non-commercial purposes, subject to full attribution. If you wish to use this manuscript for commercial purposes, please contact permissions@emerald.com.

Acceptance date

2021-08-17

Publication date

2021-09-20

Copyright date

2021

ISSN

0959-3845

Language

  • en

Depositor

Sharon Wagg. Deposit date: 21 September 2021